Thanks Tobias and all. Sorry I missed the call, I got back from travel late the night before and needed to sleep in.
I think the agenda looks pretty good. I’ll try and do an assessment of how the proposed profile maps against DCO, but I don’t promise anything. If I can, I will report.
Meanwhile, I’m trying to take a much more critical view at the principles. I think they are really good but still need a fair amount of polishing if they are to have maximum impact. To that end, I made some fairly significant mods to the intro. Please check it out, I may have not fully represented the WG view.
I suspect, I may do more editing in the coming days, but I think the principles are really good, and I look forward to seeing y’all soon.
cheers,
-m.
On 1 Mar 2018, at 08:33, TobiasWeigel <***@***.***> wrote:
Minutes document is here, in our folder:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o0L6AvL0j01L5W0jLGasW-NG3RBMQK8fkV8S...
Actions:
* Tobias: Contact Rob Quick re RPID presentation
* Larry: resolve DOI presentation options
* Tobias: Draft P11 intro slides until next week
On 01.03.2018 04:39, quzhou wrote:
Dear all,
Here is a another reminder of our next PID KI WG Meeting call on Mar.
1st, 13:00 UTC.
The connection details are as below.
Look forward to talking to you! :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://iu.zoom.us/j/899463547
Or Telephone:
Dial: +1 669 900 6833 (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll)
Meeting ID: 899 463 547
International numbers
available: https://iu.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=BMLCE-_qVD8P6omSAplYBY91HnZ5jVUj
Or connecting from IU videoconferencing equipment:
Video Bridge: 26 899 463 547
Or connecting from videoconferencing equipment outside of IU:
H.323:
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
221.122.88.195 (China)
115.114.131.7 (India)
213.19.144.110 (EMEA)
202.177.207.158 (Australia)
209.9.211.110 (Hong Kong)
64.211.144.160 (Brazil)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
Meeting ID: 899 463 547
SIP: ***@***.***
Or Skype for Business (Lync):
https://iu.zoom.us/skype/899463547
***@***.*** Team | ***@***.***
| https://kb.iu.edu/d/bfqu
Many thanks!
Best regards,
Quan (Gabriel) Zhou
PhD Candidate, Computer Science Dept., Indiana University
Research Assistant, Data to Insight Center
Tel: +1 (812)-361-5159
Email: ***@***.***
On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:33 AM, TobiasWeigel <***@***.***
> wrote:
Minutes of today's meeting here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A_F88y4qmtqIXSpdpD9vGb9PV1enmtXlkXP_...
Next call on March 1, 13:00 UTC, starting with P11 agenda discussion.
Everyone, please keep contributing to the 'guiding principles' doc,
which is becoming our recommendation base doc. We'll also need to go
through the original strawman profile again, resolve outstanding
comments based on the principles, and then transfer this into the
recommendation doc together with all other content.
Best, Tobias
Attached files:
Mail_Attachment.ics
--
Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/pid-kernel-information-wg/post/re-pid-...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/59018
--
Dr. Tobias Weigel
Abteilung Datenmanagement
Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH (DKRZ)
Bundesstraße 45 a • 20146 Hamburg • Germany
Phone: +49 40 460094-431
Email: ***@***.***
URL: http://www.dkrz.de
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-0215
Geschäftsführer: Prof. Dr. Thomas Ludwig
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 39784
--
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/pid-kernel-information-wg/post/re-pid-...
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/59018
Author: Tobias Weigel
Date: 05 Mar, 2018
Mark, all,
thank you for your editing. I also just took another sweep through the
document, made some further changes, resolved some comments, added new
ones... Latest concern is that I'm having trouble with principle 6 and I
agree that this may not be the only one that is still too ambiguous.
But we should definitely try to spend good effort in shepherding the
document to a good state as we have our official delivery set at the
Berlin plenary. So even if we cannot weed out all ambiguities, we should
at least identify them for future work.
Best, Tobias
Author: Ulrich Schwardmann
Date: 08 Mar, 2018
Dear Mark, Tobias, all,
thanks Mark for your changes. Overall they improve the principles again
quite a bit, from my point of view. I added some comments proposing some
minor changes, but overall I agree that the principles are really good
now. Hope to welcome you all in Berlin in two weeks.